Two iGaming-native platforms. Both care deeply about trust between operators and affiliates. Both think the industry has a transparency problem. They just disagree about how to fix it.

RavenTrack says you fix it by building compliance workflows into the platform. Document everything. Time-stamp everything. When the regulator calls, you pull one report and you are done.

MyAffiliates says you fix it by designing the platform around trust. Audit trails. Role-based access. Configurable visibility. When the regulator calls, the architecture speaks for itself.

Workflows versus architecture. Both valid. Both incomplete. Because neither approach answers the question that separates good operators from great ones: which affiliates are driving long-term player value, and how do you know before the data proves it.

RavenTrack: Compliance workflows and fixed-cost simplicity

Built by practitioners. Compliance workflows baked into tracking: document upload, time-stamping, approval processes, T&C re-acceptance tracking. Fixed-cost pricing with unlimited campaigns. UK-based support. Ecosystem partnerships with Optimove, TrafficGuard, and Rightlander.

Where it leads: Mid-market operators in regulated UK and European markets who need compliance documentation, cost predictability, and personal support from a team that has sat in their chair.

Where it falls short: No predictive analytics. No player-level LTV modeling. No real-time anomaly detection.

MyAffiliates: Market-leading adoption with trust-by-design

Roughly 16% market share. Audit trails, role-based access, configurable KPI visibility, multi-brand consolidation, bi-weekly releases at no extra cost. Tracking The Truth podcast shaping industry conversation.

Where it leads: Operators who want direct control, transparent packaging, multi-brand consolidation, and a vendor leading industry thinking.

Where it falls short: Same gap. Traditional architecture. No predictive intelligence. No real-time anomaly detection.

Head-to-Head: Where each platform leads

Compliance philosophy: RavenTrack productizes compliance as workflows. Operators demonstrate process compliance. MyAffiliates productizes trust as design. Operators demonstrate data integrity. Both address regulatory readiness from different angles.

Pricing: RavenTrack offers fixed-cost with unlimited campaigns. MyAffiliates includes all features at no extra cost with bi-weekly releases. Both emphasize transparency. RavenTrack focuses on cost predictability. MyAffiliates focuses on feature inclusivity.

Ecosystem: RavenTrack extends through curated partnerships. MyAffiliates extends through APIs and integrations. Curated versus flexible.

Market influence: MyAffiliates invests more in shaping industry conversation through content and thought leadership. RavenTrack invests in practitioner credibility and event visibility.

Intelitics: The best choice for operators who need intelligence beyond trust and compliance

RavenTrack and MyAffiliates both ask the right question about trust. They just stop one question short.

Yes, can operators trust their tracking data? Both platforms answer that well. But the next question is: what can operators do with that data before competitors do the same thing?

Intelitics answers the second question. Predictive player lifetime value within 72 hours. Real-time anomaly detection. Optimization signals. AI-native analytics purpose-built for betting and gaming. The intelligence layer that turns verified, trusted data into competitive advantage.

API-first architecture means operators do not choose between RavenTrack's partnership ecosystem and MyAffiliates' self-contained platform. Intelitics layers on top of either.

Frequent asked questions

What is the main difference between RavenTrack and MyAffiliates?

RavenTrack leads with compliance workflows, fixed pricing, and practitioner credibility. MyAffiliates leads with market-leading adoption, trust-by-design control, and thought leadership. Both are iGaming specialists with different philosophies.

Which is better for multi-brand operators?

MyAffiliates explicitly positions multi-brand consolidation as core. RavenTrack supports multi-brand but does not lead with it.

Why choose Intelitics over both?

Because trust and compliance are the floor. Intelitics provides the intelligence that turns trusted data into predictive action: anomaly detection, player LTV modeling, optimization signals. The layer neither incumbent delivers.

Can Intelitics work alongside either platform?

Yes. API-first architecture layers predictive intelligence on top of existing tracking infrastructure.